Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). H.S. appeals from trial court orders terminating her parental rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206419 - 2017-12-27
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). H.S. appeals from trial court orders terminating her parental rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206419 - 2017-12-27
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
. Essex alleges that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
. Essex alleges that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. No. 04-0768-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. No. 04-0768-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jerome W.
. § 48.415(6). The trial court determined that it was in the best interests of the child to terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20227 - 2017-09-21
. § 48.415(6). The trial court determined that it was in the best interests of the child to terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20227 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision, and Young was free to argue for a lesser sentence. The trial court accepted Young’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106473 - 2017-09-21
supervision, and Young was free to argue for a lesser sentence. The trial court accepted Young’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106473 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mario M. Martinez
–94, 1997–98), 757.30(1) (1997–98), and from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2751 - 2005-03-31
–94, 1997–98), 757.30(1) (1997–98), and from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2751 - 2005-03-31
State v. Major C. Latimer
an order denying him postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s refusal to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
an order denying him postconviction relief. He challenges the trial court’s refusal to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shawn Krenke v. Timothy Krenke
the contempt action.1 Timothy contends that the trial court erred by: (1) utilizing his earning capacity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10585 - 2017-09-20
the contempt action.1 Timothy contends that the trial court erred by: (1) utilizing his earning capacity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10585 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. He contends that his trial attorney was ineffective for telling him that he would not be deported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
. He contends that his trial attorney was ineffective for telling him that he would not be deported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97429 - 2013-05-30
State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
for a new trial. On appeal, Schlitt claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for several reasons. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31
for a new trial. On appeal, Schlitt claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for several reasons. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31