Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5241 - 5250 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 5241 - 5250 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
State v. David A. Foy
a judgment of conviction for delivery of cocaine base within 1000 feet of a park, as a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20
a judgment of conviction for delivery of cocaine base within 1000 feet of a park, as a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20
State v. David A. Foy
. VERGERONT, J. David Foy appeals from a judgment of conviction for delivery of cocaine base within 1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10486 - 2005-03-31
. VERGERONT, J. David Foy appeals from a judgment of conviction for delivery of cocaine base within 1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10486 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Posthuma
credibility. We affirm. I. IMPROPER EXPERT TESTIMONY Defendant claims that the State's expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8016 - 2017-09-19
credibility. We affirm. I. IMPROPER EXPERT TESTIMONY Defendant claims that the State's expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8016 - 2017-09-19
Town of Monroe v. Bowmar Appraisal, Inc.
for Bowmar’s breach of a contract. Bowmar contends that the Town lacked standing to bring the contract claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3798 - 2005-03-31
for Bowmar’s breach of a contract. Bowmar contends that the Town lacked standing to bring the contract claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Monroe v. Bowmar Appraisal, Inc.
to bring the contract claim because the Town was neither a party to nor a third-party beneficiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3798 - 2017-09-20
to bring the contract claim because the Town was neither a party to nor a third-party beneficiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3798 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
cause to arrest him, but did not claim a Miranda[2] violation. Despite his injuries, he argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54378 - 2010-09-14
cause to arrest him, but did not claim a Miranda[2] violation. Despite his injuries, he argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54378 - 2010-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS
also argued that the prosecutor breached the plea agreement when she claimed she entered it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
also argued that the prosecutor breached the plea agreement when she claimed she entered it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60761 - 2011-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
orders concerning modification of child support. She also claims circuit court bias and appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55820 - 2010-10-25
orders concerning modification of child support. She also claims circuit court bias and appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55820 - 2010-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS
)[1] motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject Joiner-El’s claims and affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50468 - 2010-05-26
)[1] motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject Joiner-El’s claims and affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50468 - 2010-05-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
ineffective assistance motion and go directly to arguing the merits of the claimed ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27161 - 2014-09-15
ineffective assistance motion and go directly to arguing the merits of the claimed ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27161 - 2014-09-15