Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52591 - 52600 of 56214 for n y c.
Search results 52591 - 52600 of 56214 for n y c.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inmate group activity. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 309.365(5)(c). ¶20 The hearing officer considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90134 - 2014-09-15
inmate group activity. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 309.365(5)(c). ¶20 The hearing officer considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90134 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 173
on the brief of Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general, and Michael C. Sanders, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
on the brief of Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general, and Michael C. Sanders, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of counsel motion without a hearing. See Phillips, 322 Wis. 2d 576, ¶17. C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014213 - 2025-09-24
ineffective assistance of counsel motion without a hearing. See Phillips, 322 Wis. 2d 576, ¶17. C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014213 - 2025-09-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
, V. DIANE C. COLLINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28236 - 2014-09-15
, V. DIANE C. COLLINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28236 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(2), (3) (c) and (4), 287.07, 287.08, 287.81 and 299.64 (2), subch. VI of ch. 77, this chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93964 - 2013-03-11
(2), (3) (c) and (4), 287.07, 287.08, 287.81 and 299.64 (2), subch. VI of ch. 77, this chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93964 - 2013-03-11
Nanette M.M. v. Gerald J.M.
person, other than the child, whom either party is legally obligated to support. (c) The standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8911 - 2005-03-31
person, other than the child, whom either party is legally obligated to support. (c) The standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Carr
circumstantial evidence. The jury was instructed that “[c]ircumstantial evidence is the proof of certain facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11433 - 2017-09-19
circumstantial evidence. The jury was instructed that “[c]ircumstantial evidence is the proof of certain facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11433 - 2017-09-19
State v. Terry L. Robertson
) (unrefuted argument deemed admitted). C. Factual Basis for Plea ¶16 Robertson contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2309 - 2005-03-31
) (unrefuted argument deemed admitted). C. Factual Basis for Plea ¶16 Robertson contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2309 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 75
and of SCR 22.26. In addition, SCR 22.31(1)(c) incorporates the statements that a petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418377 - 2021-09-29
and of SCR 22.26. In addition, SCR 22.31(1)(c) incorporates the statements that a petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418377 - 2021-09-29
[PDF]
State v. Jack L. Cox
claims that because he offered an affirmative defense of inability to pay that “[c]learly, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10135 - 2017-09-19
claims that because he offered an affirmative defense of inability to pay that “[c]learly, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10135 - 2017-09-19