Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 52681 - 52690 of 68288 for law.

Agnes E. Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System Annuity and Pension Board
Resolution of this case involves statutory interpretation, an issue of law that we review without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7505 - 2005-05-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a mixed question of fact and law. Jenkins, 355 Wis. 2d 180, ¶38. We review a circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246554 - 2019-09-12

2008 WI APP 40
, the interpretation and application of § 236.45(2) to these facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31950 - 2008-03-18

[PDF] WI APP 32
and one party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Walker v. Tobin, 209 Wis. 2d 72, 76, 568
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35601 - 2014-09-15

WI App 24 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP667 Complete Title o...
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2).[2] ¶13 Here, the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91676 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 57. Specifically: A reviewing court first determines as a matter of law whether a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82323 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
case law regarding ex post facto violations and the mandatory DNA surcharge. See State v. Radaj
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512901 - 2022-04-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465715 - 2021-12-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
its discretion when it examines the relevant facts, applies a proper standard of law, and using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275831 - 2020-08-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of fact and law. Funk, 335 Wis. 2d 369, ¶30. “[A] circuit court’s findings regarding the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198038 - 2017-10-18