Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5271 - 5280 of 74540 for public records.

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Ward
on his disciplinary record, a public reprimand was appropriate. ¶29 As previously noted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16721 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Ward
Attorney Ward already has a private reprimand on his disciplinary record, a public reprimand
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16721 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Matthew D.
that the other two offenders, who had prior records, were both being waived into adult court. Tracey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13399 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Linssen’s defense counsel pointed to her lack of criminal record, her cooperation with authorities, her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70588 - 2011-09-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of probation. ¶8 Linssen’s defense counsel pointed to her lack of criminal record, her cooperation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70588 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because the circuit court was biased. The record does not support Young’s claims. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256662 - 2020-03-18

State v. Brandy Albert Essex
). There is a strong public policy against interfering with the trial court’s discretion in determining sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brandy Albert Essex
, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971),] and require the application to be stated on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Thomas Willan v. Charlene Brereton
a firearm. Based on this record, the circuit court determined that Willan was ineligible to hold public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15744 - 2017-09-21

Thomas Willan v. Charlene Brereton
on this record, the circuit court determined that Willan was ineligible to hold public office in Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15744 - 2005-03-31