Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 25845 for bench warrant/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 244.41(1)(b) (2017-18)1 and the terms of the POA. Following a bench trial, the court found that Jon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243430 - 2019-07-09

COURT OF APPEALS
its ruling from the bench. The court specifically found that Fedran had threatened to kill himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33836 - 2010-12-20

[PDF] NOTICE
of the hearing, the circuit court made its ruling from the bench. The court specifically found that Fedran had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33836 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
the scope of a lawful warrant, we affirm. Fields was charged with possession of THC as a second
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117806 - 2014-07-29

[PDF] Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
3 exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement because of the rapid dissipation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4053 - 2017-09-20

Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
that a warrantless blood test falls under the “exigent circumstances” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4053 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roosevelt Manuel
the basis for the arrest warrant recklessly omitted information that, if included, would have led
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the scene became aware that Eichman had an active arrest warrant from La Crosse County. Ely’s supervisor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604935 - 2022-12-29

State v. Roosevelt Manuel
that the detective who provided information forming the basis for the arrest warrant recklessly omitted information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11314 - 2005-03-31

State v. Peter R. Baumgarten
to display the outstanding warrant for Baumgarten’s arrest that caused the officer to stop him. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12036 - 2005-03-31