Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 68502 for did.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 68502 for did.
State v. Arthur Foster
Fifth Amendment right to counsel.[1] Because we conclude that Raebel did not act as an agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10019 - 2005-03-31
Fifth Amendment right to counsel.[1] Because we conclude that Raebel did not act as an agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10019 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case, the court did not enter a separate judgment but instead entered an order terminating Keri’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27265 - 2014-09-15
in this case, the court did not enter a separate judgment but instead entered an order terminating Keri’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27265 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shawn A. Timm
because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain him. We agree. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4847 - 2017-09-19
because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to detain him. We agree. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4847 - 2017-09-19
City of New Berlin v. William P. Servi
was a urine test. He then told Servi that “if [Servi] did take our breath test, then he also had the option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2006-09-26
was a urine test. He then told Servi that “if [Servi] did take our breath test, then he also had the option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2006-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered. Zimbal testified that his attorney did not go over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101589 - 2017-09-21
not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered. Zimbal testified that his attorney did not go over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101589 - 2017-09-21
Sagler Masonry & Concrete v. Jeff Netzer
judgment entered in favor of Sagler Masonry & Concrete. We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10869 - 2005-03-31
judgment entered in favor of Sagler Masonry & Concrete. We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10869 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tdurado Jacques Head
to thirteen because “Each attorney is permitted four strikes.” At no time did Head’s attorney, Carol Law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13574 - 2005-03-31
to thirteen because “Each attorney is permitted four strikes.” At no time did Head’s attorney, Carol Law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13574 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald W. Mau
on the reliability of a retrograde blood alcohol analysis and because trial counsel did not move to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15132 - 2005-03-31
on the reliability of a retrograde blood alcohol analysis and because trial counsel did not move to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15132 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
faced. The court did not explicitly state during the colloquy that Williams had a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
faced. The court did not explicitly state during the colloquy that Williams had a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
test’s administration. Because the circuit court did not admit the preliminary breath test result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91012 - 2012-12-26
test’s administration. Because the circuit court did not admit the preliminary breath test result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91012 - 2012-12-26