Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 69007 for had.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 69007 for had.
State v. David E. Bowers
motion seeking to withdraw his guilty pleas, claiming that a manifest injustice had occurred because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4310 - 2005-03-31
motion seeking to withdraw his guilty pleas, claiming that a manifest injustice had occurred because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4310 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) and § 48.356. The September 2012 order had been entered following a Permanency Plan Hearing. It is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
) and § 48.356. The September 2012 order had been entered following a Permanency Plan Hearing. It is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123010 - 2014-10-01
2007 WI APP 160
was involuntary because he had been seized by the wardens. We conclude the court utilized an incorrect test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28815 - 2007-06-28
was involuntary because he had been seized by the wardens. We conclude the court utilized an incorrect test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28815 - 2007-06-28
COURT OF APPEALS
advised him that he had no defense to the charges originally filed against him.[1] The motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135724 - 2015-03-01
advised him that he had no defense to the charges originally filed against him.[1] The motion asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135724 - 2015-03-01
[PDF]
State v. Lynn G.
in terminating Lynn’s parental rights, this court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lynn G. and Adam L. had a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6920 - 2017-09-20
in terminating Lynn’s parental rights, this court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lynn G. and Adam L. had a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6920 - 2017-09-20
Jodi Hurlburt v. OHIC Insurance Company
, and because the statute of limitations had expired. The Hurlburts argue that dismissal was erroneous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5101 - 2005-03-31
, and because the statute of limitations had expired. The Hurlburts argue that dismissal was erroneous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence was not relevant because Braun had already been convicted and sentenced for his involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223974 - 2018-10-25
evidence was not relevant because Braun had already been convicted and sentenced for his involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223974 - 2018-10-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the child remained in need of protection or services under WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2) and that T.C.G. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223780 - 2018-10-23
that the child remained in need of protection or services under WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2) and that T.C.G. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223780 - 2018-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Sammy J. Dickey
signed the blood/urine analysis form indicating that he had collected the blood sample, testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3615 - 2017-09-19
signed the blood/urine analysis form indicating that he had collected the blood sample, testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3615 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
allegation that [Olu A. Rhodes] had a motive to harm the victim”; (2) the trial court erroneously allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15
allegation that [Olu A. Rhodes] had a motive to harm the victim”; (2) the trial court erroneously allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15