Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53241 - 53250 of 74838 for judgment for us.
Search results 53241 - 53250 of 74838 for judgment for us.
COURT OF APPEALS
it largely governs our holding in this case. Michael’s brief is silent on this point. The State refers us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15
it largely governs our holding in this case. Michael’s brief is silent on this point. The State refers us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15
State v. Vito George Ambrosia
of Ambrosia's later statement. The State argues that Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985), allows it to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10076 - 2005-03-31
of Ambrosia's later statement. The State argues that Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985), allows it to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10076 - 2005-03-31
State v. Guy Douglas
that ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied to him because both of the State’s experts used an improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11981 - 2005-03-31
that ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied to him because both of the State’s experts used an improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11981 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for an order excluding “from use at trial testimony or evidence of any kind by [Marcon] related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161402 - 2017-09-21
for an order excluding “from use at trial testimony or evidence of any kind by [Marcon] related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161402 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the criminal complaint, which was used as a factual basis to support his plea, did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93190 - 2014-09-15
the criminal complaint, which was used as a factual basis to support his plea, did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93190 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David Allen Bruski
has no standing to raise a Fourth Amendment challenge. 1 Discussion ¶11 We use a two-step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21227 - 2017-09-21
has no standing to raise a Fourth Amendment challenge. 1 Discussion ¶11 We use a two-step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21227 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald B.
: neither could speak, use utensils to eat, or use the bathroom; they refused to keep their clothes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2328 - 2005-03-31
: neither could speak, use utensils to eat, or use the bathroom; they refused to keep their clothes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2328 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
front door. A male, subsequently identified as Wieczorek, answered. Mork observed Wieczorek was using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73522 - 2011-11-07
front door. A male, subsequently identified as Wieczorek, answered. Mork observed Wieczorek was using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73522 - 2011-11-07
State v. Shane A. Mahler
to use a reasonable procedure in drawing blood. Because Mahler’s objection for refusing a blood draw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16107 - 2005-03-31
to use a reasonable procedure in drawing blood. Because Mahler’s objection for refusing a blood draw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16107 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 242
when it examines the relevant facts, applies the proper legal standard, and uses a rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26627 - 2006-11-20
when it examines the relevant facts, applies the proper legal standard, and uses a rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26627 - 2006-11-20