Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53371 - 53380 of 57673 for id.
Search results 53371 - 53380 of 57673 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
the whole concept of probation. Id., 133 Wis. 2d at 52–53, 393 N.W.2d at 107. Our comments in Rodriguez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36702 - 2009-06-08
the whole concept of probation. Id., 133 Wis. 2d at 52–53, 393 N.W.2d at 107. Our comments in Rodriguez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36702 - 2009-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
is illegal or void; or when it determines that the sentence is unduly harsh or unconscionable. Id., ¶35 & n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100621 - 2013-08-13
is illegal or void; or when it determines that the sentence is unduly harsh or unconscionable. Id., ¶35 & n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100621 - 2013-08-13
[PDF]
, intelligent and voluntary.”); id. at 212 (a court must also make an independent determination about whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890001 - 2024-12-12
, intelligent and voluntary.”); id. at 212 (a court must also make an independent determination about whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890001 - 2024-12-12
State v. Jesse J. Rabas
that it not be unreasonable under the circumstances. Id. at 810. ¶9 For an investigatory stop to be valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2823 - 2005-03-31
that it not be unreasonable under the circumstances. Id. at 810. ¶9 For an investigatory stop to be valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2823 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph P. Bury
at the preliminary examination.” Id. at 457 (emphasis added). In Richer, the supreme court elaborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2285 - 2005-03-31
at the preliminary examination.” Id. at 457 (emphasis added). In Richer, the supreme court elaborated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2285 - 2005-03-31
County of Sheboygan v. Rodney G.R.
in favor of the order for commitment. Id. As we explain below, the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4953 - 2013-04-18
in favor of the order for commitment. Id. As we explain below, the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4953 - 2013-04-18
Ralph W. Hutchens, Sr. v. Daniel R. Simonson
is ambiguous is also a question of law. Id. We conclude the deed is unambiguous. ¶16 After going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7495 - 2005-03-31
is ambiguous is also a question of law. Id. We conclude the deed is unambiguous. ¶16 After going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7495 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on a motion for dismissal only if it is clearly wrong.[2] Id. at 783-84 (quoting Olfe v. Gordon, 93 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57400 - 2010-12-07
on a motion for dismissal only if it is clearly wrong.[2] Id. at 783-84 (quoting Olfe v. Gordon, 93 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57400 - 2010-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. See id. at 386-87. Sulieman had the burden of showing that trial in Wisconsin would be inconvenient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142170 - 2014-10-07
. See id. at 386-87. Sulieman had the burden of showing that trial in Wisconsin would be inconvenient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142170 - 2014-10-07
State v. Frederick F.
of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence is for the trier of fact.’” Id. at 504, 451 N.W.2d at 756 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15250 - 2005-11-14
of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence is for the trier of fact.’” Id. at 504, 451 N.W.2d at 756 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15250 - 2005-11-14