Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 53371 - 53380 of 57719 for id.
Search results 53371 - 53380 of 57719 for id.
CA Blank Order
.” See id. For these reasons, we conclude that there would be no arguable merit to a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112455 - 2014-05-12
.” See id. For these reasons, we conclude that there would be no arguable merit to a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112455 - 2014-05-12
State v. Tracy D. Reynolds
the officer or the defendant. Id. The State argues that an officer who has reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11491 - 2005-03-31
the officer or the defendant. Id. The State argues that an officer who has reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11491 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for newly discovered evidence. Id. Evidence of Williams’ blood alcohol content, the State’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58829 - 2011-01-12
for newly discovered evidence. Id. Evidence of Williams’ blood alcohol content, the State’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58829 - 2011-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
in the transaction. Id. at 1-2. ¶14 In his brief to this court, Foley admits: (1) that he gave Bystra a $10,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114653 - 2014-06-16
in the transaction. Id. at 1-2. ¶14 In his brief to this court, Foley admits: (1) that he gave Bystra a $10,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114653 - 2014-06-16
Sheila T. v. State
de novo. Id. at 1037. DISCUSSION ¶11 Sheila has appealed the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20950 - 2006-01-17
de novo. Id. at 1037. DISCUSSION ¶11 Sheila has appealed the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20950 - 2006-01-17
State v. Eric T. Scott
caused prejudice. Id. ¶7 A defendant must first allege ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17891 - 2005-05-02
caused prejudice. Id. ¶7 A defendant must first allege ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17891 - 2005-05-02
State v. Eric T. Scott
caused prejudice. Id. ¶7 A defendant must first allege ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17894 - 2005-05-02
caused prejudice. Id. ¶7 A defendant must first allege ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17894 - 2005-05-02
State v. Nathaniel Jordan
shifts to the State to prove the error was harmless.[1] Id. ¶7 Despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21549 - 2006-02-27
shifts to the State to prove the error was harmless.[1] Id. ¶7 Despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21549 - 2006-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to our independent review. Id. As to Robinson’s challenge to his sentence, our review of a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104908 - 2013-11-26
to our independent review. Id. As to Robinson’s challenge to his sentence, our review of a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104908 - 2013-11-26
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
the dispositional order. See id. Reasonable Efforts. As a separate ground for reversing the extension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15067 - 2017-09-21
the dispositional order. See id. Reasonable Efforts. As a separate ground for reversing the extension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15067 - 2017-09-21