Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54001 - 54010 of 82590 for simple case.
Search results 54001 - 54010 of 82590 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
afforded Ortiz appellate review of his case. He has not offered any reason for failing to raise his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
afforded Ortiz appellate review of his case. He has not offered any reason for failing to raise his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Stewart appealed. We concluded that the plea colloquy was defective and remanded the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56193 - 2014-09-15
and Stewart appealed. We concluded that the plea colloquy was defective and remanded the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56193 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the remaining count in this and another case, and read in the latter. The parties jointly recommended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98169 - 2014-09-15
the remaining count in this and another case, and read in the latter. The parties jointly recommended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98169 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240669 - 2019-05-10
of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240669 - 2019-05-10
[PDF]
State v. Walter J. Griffin
informed the court that the parties did not have a sentencing agreement in this case. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24559 - 2017-09-21
informed the court that the parties did not have a sentencing agreement in this case. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24559 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134316 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134316 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues that the third definition applies to his case: “Statements that were made under circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28734 - 2014-09-15
argues that the third definition applies to his case: “Statements that were made under circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28734 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 28
2012 WI 28 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2011AP329-FT COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79847 - 2014-09-15
2012 WI 28 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2011AP329-FT COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79847 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark J. Santner v. David H. Schwarz
. 2 State ex rel. Jones was a parole revocation case, but its reasoning applies equally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3489 - 2017-09-20
. 2 State ex rel. Jones was a parole revocation case, but its reasoning applies equally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3489 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Rodney C.M.
An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001, and was to expire on January 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5728 - 2017-09-19
An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001, and was to expire on January 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5728 - 2017-09-19