Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54011 - 54020 of 68246 for law.

[PDF] State v. James L. Blackburn
the interpretation of § 976.05, STATS., a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Whittemore, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12090 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
as a matter of law. Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2) (2011-12).[3] In deciding if genuine issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98795 - 2013-07-01

State v. Harry S. Bernstein
to a jury trial in a proceeding under ch. 980 is governed by § 980.05(2) rather than the case law governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14351 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional violation took place, however, is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133593 - 2015-01-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
’ is a defense available to defendants when a law enforcement officer has used improper methods to induce them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238066 - 2019-03-26

[PDF] Melisa Urmanski v. Town of Bradley
Law Office, P.A. of Minneapolis, MN. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15950 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is sufficient to sustain a verdict is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103159 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robin C. Acker v. Lawrence P. Sullivan, M.D.
is a question of law.” Id. Sullivan's argument that Mrs. Acker lost only a one percent chance of a cure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8465 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kathleen Jensen v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
jurisdiction for a particular case only." Black's Law Dictionary 1227 (7th ed. 1999). FILED FEB 13
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17557 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
claim as a mixed question of fact and law. We will not reverse the trial court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35516 - 2014-09-15