Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54041 - 54050 of 68257 for law.

State v. Rick L. Edwards
treatment. This issue requires us to interpret a number of statutes, which presents a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6310 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
charged L.J.H. with threat to a law enforcement officer, possession of THC as a second and subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080213 - 2026-02-25

Certification
, ¶7 n.2, 296 Wis. 2d 771, 723 N.W.2d 775. There, we observed that Loutsch may no longer be the law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33154 - 2014-03-09

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Shannon K.
of the law, then Shannon’s trial counsel was not deficient in not making this argument to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3777 - 2013-09-23

COURT OF APPEALS
applied an erroneous view of the law.” State v. Martinez, 150 Wis. 2d 62, 71, 440 N.W.2d 783 (1989). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31943 - 2008-02-25

COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 242. Whether the facts fulfill the legal standard is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89358 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
or criminal law.[4] We begin with Popke’s first argument. ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 346.05 provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33681 - 2008-08-06

Town of Grand Chute v. U.S. Paper Converters, Inc.
to a particular set of facts present questions of law we review de novo. Eastman v. City of Madison, 117 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14560 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 7, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals...
if the instructions, taken as a whole, communicated an incorrect statement of the law or otherwise probably misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96459 - 2013-05-06

COURT OF APPEALS
as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49926 - 2010-05-11