Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5411 - 5420 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 5411 - 5420 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250466 - 2019-11-27
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250466 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the Institution Case File. It will be available at the time of your next parole consideration…. The Parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97993 - 2014-09-15
in the Institution Case File. It will be available at the time of your next parole consideration…. The Parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gary R. Malkmus
, the court convicted Malkmus of violating WIS. ADMIN. CODE §§ ATCP 110.02(7)(c) and 110.05(3) (2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26332 - 2017-09-21
, the court convicted Malkmus of violating WIS. ADMIN. CODE §§ ATCP 110.02(7)(c) and 110.05(3) (2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26332 - 2017-09-21
T. William Cook v. Walworth County Board of Adjustment
law certiorari standard of review in this case. See Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Sauk County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12883 - 2005-03-31
law certiorari standard of review in this case. See Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Sauk County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12883 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Commission has been received, reviewed and will be placed in the Institution Case File. It will be available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97993 - 2013-06-10
Commission has been received, reviewed and will be placed in the Institution Case File. It will be available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97993 - 2013-06-10
State v. Leopoldo Pequeno
, the test results will be inadmissible at trial. In this case, Leopoldo Pequeno argues that the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6142 - 2005-03-31
, the test results will be inadmissible at trial. In this case, Leopoldo Pequeno argues that the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tony Walker v. Gary McCaughtry
. No(s). 97-0098 3 The evidence was sufficient to find Walker guilty. WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11944 - 2017-09-21
. No(s). 97-0098 3 The evidence was sufficient to find Walker guilty. WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11944 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
and WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. DOC 316, as questions of law. See Pulsfus Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Town of Leeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15537 - 2017-09-21
and WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. DOC 316, as questions of law. See Pulsfus Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Town of Leeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15537 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andrew G. Busalacchi
chapter 144, Stats., and Wis. Adm. Code Ch. NR 447 did not contain definitions of “owner” applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10089 - 2005-03-31
chapter 144, Stats., and Wis. Adm. Code Ch. NR 447 did not contain definitions of “owner” applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10089 - 2005-03-31
Mary Scheuermann v. Karen Cigan
the security deposit. See Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 134.06(4)(a).[2] Scheuermann sued Cigan. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6438 - 2005-03-31
the security deposit. See Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 134.06(4)(a).[2] Scheuermann sued Cigan. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6438 - 2005-03-31