Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5431 - 5440 of 83387 for simple case search.
Search results 5431 - 5440 of 83387 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Linda Lacey
should have been suppressed because of defective search warrants; and (6) her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6991 - 2017-09-20
should have been suppressed because of defective search warrants; and (6) her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6991 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Linda Lacey
should have been suppressed because of defective search warrants; and (6) her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6992 - 2017-09-20
should have been suppressed because of defective search warrants; and (6) her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6992 - 2017-09-20
Frontsheet
in this case is whether the police officers' warrantless entry into Robinson's apartment and subsequent search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52178 - 2010-07-14
in this case is whether the police officers' warrantless entry into Robinson's apartment and subsequent search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52178 - 2010-07-14
[PDF]
WI 80
, J. (dissenting). Today, this court decides three cases, each of which involves a search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52178 - 2014-09-15
, J. (dissenting). Today, this court decides three cases, each of which involves a search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52178 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kelly L. McCray
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2746-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13046 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2746-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13046 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie Groenke
, and because “justice” does not require a reversal in this case, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
, and because “justice” does not require a reversal in this case, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kelly L. McCray
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2746-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13046 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2746-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13046 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rolando M. Tong
a search warrant on “the nature of the underlying circumstances and concepts” of each individual case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12964 - 2005-03-31
a search warrant on “the nature of the underlying circumstances and concepts” of each individual case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12964 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
not be considered law of the case. First, it argues that the footnote regarding its failure to justify the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63163 - 2011-04-25
not be considered law of the case. First, it argues that the footnote regarding its failure to justify the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63163 - 2011-04-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
law of the case. First, it argues that the footnote regarding its failure to justify the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63163 - 2014-09-15
law of the case. First, it argues that the footnote regarding its failure to justify the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63163 - 2014-09-15