Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Brad A. Peterson
postconviction orders denying his motions for sentence modification. The state No(s). 96-3677-CR-NM 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11887 - 2017-09-21
postconviction orders denying his motions for sentence modification. The state No(s). 96-3677-CR-NM 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11887 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brad A. Peterson
, resisting an officer, and from postconviction orders denying his motions for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11888 - 2005-03-31
, resisting an officer, and from postconviction orders denying his motions for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11888 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
. ¶3 To determine whether the circuit court's granting of the motion to transfer was an erroneous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84733 - 2012-07-10
. ¶3 To determine whether the circuit court's granting of the motion to transfer was an erroneous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84733 - 2012-07-10
[PDF]
WI 88
the merits of Kroner's claims. ¶3 To determine whether the circuit court's granting of the motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84733 - 2014-09-15
the merits of Kroner's claims. ¶3 To determine whether the circuit court's granting of the motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84733 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
motion for sentencing relief. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26959 - 2006-10-30
motion for sentencing relief. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26959 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We begin with the suppression motion. Lovejoy argued that statements he made while in custody were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140210 - 2017-09-21
. We begin with the suppression motion. Lovejoy argued that statements he made while in custody were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140210 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
statements he made to police. He argued that the custodial statements he gave were involuntary because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140210 - 2015-04-16
statements he made to police. He argued that the custodial statements he gave were involuntary because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140210 - 2015-04-16
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of an unpublished court of appeals decision denying his motion for post-conviction relief. 1 He asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163357 - 2017-09-21
of an unpublished court of appeals decision denying his motion for post-conviction relief. 1 He asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163357 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31116 - 2014-09-15
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31116 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding that State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31116 - 2007-12-10
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding that State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31116 - 2007-12-10