Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 68206 for law.

[PDF] Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
reviewing the relevant case law, the circuit court concluded that it committed error when it reopened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mark Olsen v. Edward Hoffmann
requires reopening due to mistake of law, the legislative intent of the Wisconsin Consumer Act supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24751 - 2017-09-21

David J. Winkel v.
: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against David J. Winkel, Attorney at Law. DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17200 - 2005-03-31

Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
to law because it acted under an erroneous interpretation of the ordinance. We conclude that the land use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14174 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
suspicion to believe that Denner was violating the law. The court asked the parties to brief whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27165 - 2006-11-15

[PDF] County of Dane v. Steven J. Granum
the implied consent law, ยง 343.305, STATS.2 That violation, according to Granum, should result in the loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10112 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
consistent with the Manual and case law, the court made adjustments to that appraisal to arrive at valuations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131662 - 2014-12-16

State v. Robert S. Martinez
law. Martinez reasons that his choice to comply was not voluntary since the officer informed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3173 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Randy O. Bohardt
disrespect for the court and thought he was above the law, and (2) the trial court punished Bohardt for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10111 - 2017-09-19

State v. Peter D. Grefsheim
for the presence of alcohol. We conclude that the law enforcement agency met its obligation to make two tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14954 - 2005-03-31