Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 54931 - 54940 of 59470 for quit claim deed.

2010 WI APP 57
assistance of counsel claim. Therefore, Brimer must show his attorney’s failure to raise a Fifth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. This determination affected his ability to claim retirement benefits from the County. ¶2 The Estate argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219877 - 2018-10-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the defendant’s claim that the imposition of a mandatory DNA surcharge for his 2013 crime “violated the Ex Post
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215640 - 2018-07-12

COURT OF APPEALS
in the interests of justice. Both of these claims were based, in part, on his assertion that Serenitee did not die
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61400 - 2011-03-22

Robert Plevin v. Department of Transportation
additional methods of proving non-permission could open the way for fraudulent claims and interfere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5959 - 2005-03-31

County of Adams v. Daniel M. Ciesla
for appeal his claim that he was entitled to have a jury decide whether he had been entrapped. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15461 - 2005-03-31

David Lang v. Dianne J. Seibert
of issues, Seibert includes a third issue, whether the trial court erroneously dismissed her claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10736 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeremiah C.
to the contrary, the State relies upon Wis. Stat. § 938.355(4), which it claims applies to all orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5426 - 2005-03-31

State v. Patrick T. Glover
. He claimed that under State v. Fields, 2000 WI App 218, ¶23, 239 Wis. 2d 38, 619 N.W.2d 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20709 - 2005-12-20

State v. Robert Verdone
considerations require that we address Verdone's sufficiency of evidence claim. See Burks v. United States, 437
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8416 - 2005-03-31