Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 551 - 560 of 839 for holt.

Wisconsin Gas Company v. Beth Bauer
that decision on the wrong reason. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3598 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. If so, the rule of forfeiture or waiver is inapplicable to a respondent. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201495 - 2017-11-07

Brown County v. Noreen O.
still affirm the trial court’s decision. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124-25, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6083 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
incorrectly. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985) (objection not made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45163 - 2009-12-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124-25, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985), superseded by statute on other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116633 - 2017-09-21

WI App 134 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2203 Complete Title o...
may affirm the trial court’s decision on grounds not argued to the trial court, see State v. Holt, 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69294 - 2011-09-27

State v. Armando P. Rodriguez
but is a judicial act of the court which it thereafter recognizes as a binding decision. State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13178 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for the wrong reasons. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985). We believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35063 - 2008-12-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 120, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985). Thus, to the extent Rodriguez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546984 - 2022-07-26

State v. Barry A. Bullard
if the result is unfavorable.” State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3339 - 2005-03-31