Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 551 - 560 of 59916 for quit claim deed.
Search results 551 - 560 of 59916 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
WI APP 39
7 Kapinus moved for summary judgment on all claims except for the claim of trespass, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528487 - 2022-08-10
7 Kapinus moved for summary judgment on all claims except for the claim of trespass, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528487 - 2022-08-10
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
to their property, on Eckendorf’s property. Rae Best, the Austins’ predecessor in interest, granted by deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
to their property, on Eckendorf’s property. Rae Best, the Austins’ predecessor in interest, granted by deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
, granted by deed the thirty-foot-wide easement. The grant specifically describes the area in metes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2391 - 2017-09-19
, granted by deed the thirty-foot-wide easement. The grant specifically describes the area in metes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2391 - 2017-09-19
Pearl A. Powers v. Thomas F. Powers
executed a quitclaim deed of the residence at 5611 - 44th Avenue in Kenosha to Patrick Powers.[1] The deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11947 - 2005-03-31
executed a quitclaim deed of the residence at 5611 - 44th Avenue in Kenosha to Patrick Powers.[1] The deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11947 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 21
earlier, on October 13, 2005, they had executed a quit claim deed that had transferred a remainder
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48403 - 2014-09-15
earlier, on October 13, 2005, they had executed a quit claim deed that had transferred a remainder
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Pearl A. Powers v. Thomas F. Powers
. The undisputed facts are that on April 13, 1990, Thomas and Pearl executed a quitclaim deed of the residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11947 - 2017-09-21
. The undisputed facts are that on April 13, 1990, Thomas and Pearl executed a quitclaim deed of the residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, concluding it was barred by claim preclusion based on the Engelkings’ failed attempt to obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93997 - 2014-09-15
, concluding it was barred by claim preclusion based on the Engelkings’ failed attempt to obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93997 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
as to the 2009 pipelines, concluding it was barred by claim preclusion based on the Engelkings’ failed attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93997 - 2013-03-11
as to the 2009 pipelines, concluding it was barred by claim preclusion based on the Engelkings’ failed attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93997 - 2013-03-11
[PDF]
WI App 20
In this case the subject matter claimed to be the gift causa mortis is the forgiveness of a debt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77157 - 2014-09-15
In this case the subject matter claimed to be the gift causa mortis is the forgiveness of a debt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77157 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the deeds are ambiguous on this issue and resolved that ambiguity based on evidence extrinsic to the deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101610 - 2017-09-21
that the deeds are ambiguous on this issue and resolved that ambiguity based on evidence extrinsic to the deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101610 - 2017-09-21