Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5501 - 5510 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] JD-1761; Judgment for Unpaid Restitution/Forfeiture
and/or the custodial parent for unpaid restitution. unpaid forfeiture. unpaid surcharge. 3. Notice
/formdisplay/JD-1761.pdf?formNumber=JD-1761&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2023-04-06

[MS WORD] JD-1761: Judgment for Unpaid Restitution/Forfeiture/Surcharge
and/or the custodial parent for |_| unpaid restitution. |_| unpaid forfeiture. |_| unpaid surcharge. 3. Notice
/formdisplay/JD-1761.doc?formNumber=JD-1761&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2023-04-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
motion for plea withdrawal. Olson pled guilty to a charge of misdemeanor battery in 1994, and received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246646 - 2019-09-27

County of Winnebago v. Ralph Wachtveitl
of conviction. Background The evidence adduced at a hearing on Wachtveitl's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8838 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. William Brueggen
for OWI. For purposes of his motion, Brueggen does not dispute that he was highly intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2206 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
filed a motion to suppress his custodial statement to police. Following a hearing on the matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237694 - 2019-03-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with a child 1 and an order denying in part his postconviction motion for resentencing. His appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106759 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a crime (PTAC) and as a repeater, and from an order denying her motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244067 - 2019-07-24

[PDF] County of Winnebago v. Ralph Wachtveitl
. No. 95-0872-FT -2- BACKGROUND The evidence adduced at a hearing on Wachtveitl's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8838 - 2017-09-19

State v. William Brueggen
and arrested him for OWI. For purposes of his motion, Brueggen does not dispute that he was highly intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2206 - 2005-03-31