Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5501 - 5510 of 68546 for law.

Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
reviewing the relevant case law, the circuit court concluded that it committed error when it reopened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15406 - 2005-03-31

State v. Peter D. Grefsheim
for the presence of alcohol. We conclude that the law enforcement agency met its obligation to make two tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14954 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
contends that the board did not act according to law because it acted under an erroneous interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14174 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Firstar Trust Company v. Richard D. Gebhardt
of law. Because the law of the case holds that the trial court did not err in dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13072 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Krueger testified briefly and Seymour moved to suppress all evidence seized as a result of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243628 - 2019-07-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sentence is a codification of an assessment hierarchy that was developed under common law. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243056 - 2019-07-03

State v. Randy O. Bohardt
on inaccurate facts to conclude that Bohardt had disrespect for the court and thought he was above the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10111 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Randy O. Bohardt
disrespect for the court and thought he was above the law, and (2) the trial court punished Bohardt for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10111 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] David J. Winkel v.
: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against David J. Winkel, Attorney at Law. DISCIPLINARY
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17200 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
reviewing the relevant case law, the circuit court concluded that it committed error when it reopened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15406 - 2017-09-21