Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5501 - 5510 of 20929 for word.

[PDF] WI App 259
is not referred to within the statute. No. 2006AP2320 20 So, the question becomes, can the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30842 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 131
to the specified penalty. (Emphasis added.) The word “otherwise” makes clear that the statute is not listing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33501 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Paul A. Weimer v. Country Mutual Insurance Company
the words to mean." Kuhn v. Allstate Ins. Co., 193 Wis. 2d 50, 60, 532 N.W.2d 124 (1995). No. 96
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17118 - 2017-09-21

Paul A. Weimer v. Country Mutual Insurance Company
have understood the words to mean." Kuhn v. Allstate Ins. Co., 193 Wis. 2d 50, 60, 532 N.W.2d 124
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17118 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] American Standard Insurance Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
words, the insurance companies are asserting that to the extent that the Wisconsin franchise tax
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17247 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund v. St. Mary's Hospital of Milwaukee
the clear and unambiguous words of the statutes, if a provider complied with the requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10029 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Christopher L. Combs
it its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially defined words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25713 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CBS, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
the words of the statute, is clearly contrary to legislative intent, or is otherwise . . . without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17202 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 172
what you get; I told you about putting your hands on me, words similar to that.” ¶7 Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56996 - 2010-12-13

2010 WI APP 64
The DNR suggests the words “review” and “anew” plainly evince a legislative intent to limit the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48970 - 2011-02-07