Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55211 - 55220 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 55211 - 55220 of 83389 for simple case search.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943547 - 2025-04-23
at trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943547 - 2025-04-23
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Lohmeier
of these cases were decided under WIS. STAT. § 57.072 (1975), which was repealed and recreated by ch. 353, Laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2166 - 2017-09-19
of these cases were decided under WIS. STAT. § 57.072 (1975), which was repealed and recreated by ch. 353, Laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2166 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2004 WI App 2, ¶21, 269 Wis. 2d 260, 674 N.W.2d 594 (citation omitted). In that case, we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31117 - 2014-09-15
, 2004 WI App 2, ¶21, 269 Wis. 2d 260, 674 N.W.2d 594 (citation omitted). In that case, we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31117 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Zenobia W.
. The case proceeded to the dispositional hearing, during which Zenobia contested termination. Gwen Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6865 - 2017-09-20
. The case proceeded to the dispositional hearing, during which Zenobia contested termination. Gwen Doyle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6865 - 2017-09-20
State v. John H. H., Jr.
) Brief of appellant…. The brief must contain: …. (d) A statement of the case, which must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
) Brief of appellant…. The brief must contain: …. (d) A statement of the case, which must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21718 - 2006-03-14
[PDF]
Village of Avoca v. Gail Carr
not, in any case, exceed a height of 6 feet, shall not exceed a height of 4 feet in the front yard and shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3232 - 2017-09-19
not, in any case, exceed a height of 6 feet, shall not exceed a height of 4 feet in the front yard and shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3232 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
), stating: [y]ou are to serve to your mandatory release date. This is not a case where the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34814 - 2014-09-15
), stating: [y]ou are to serve to your mandatory release date. This is not a case where the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34814 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Derek W. v. Susan K.B.
not visited or communicated with Brenda. ¶4 The case proceeded to a fact-finding hearing before a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4074 - 2017-09-20
not visited or communicated with Brenda. ¶4 The case proceeded to a fact-finding hearing before a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4074 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Richmond
the defendant holding the tote bag. The case was sent to the jury. The jury sent five questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19
the defendant holding the tote bag. The case was sent to the jury. The jury sent five questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19