Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55331 - 55340 of 83713 for case search.
Search results 55331 - 55340 of 83713 for case search.
99-CV-208 Randal Bidstrup v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
2001 WI App 171 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-1607 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2698 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 171 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-1607 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2698 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of Brad’s brief2 and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
. Based upon our review of Brad’s brief2 and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
Shelby L.K. v. Steven O.
, Tracey [R.K.]. The procedural status of the case is tortured. On September 26, 1984, a paternity action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12194 - 2005-03-31
, Tracey [R.K.]. The procedural status of the case is tortured. On September 26, 1984, a paternity action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12194 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
disputes during the time leading up to the shooting. The State’s theory of the case was that Akins shot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114891 - 2014-06-23
disputes during the time leading up to the shooting. The State’s theory of the case was that Akins shot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114891 - 2014-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recognized in Coleman and WIS JI—CRIMINAL 1343A can apply in a case, like this one, where the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690600 - 2023-08-15
recognized in Coleman and WIS JI—CRIMINAL 1343A can apply in a case, like this one, where the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=690600 - 2023-08-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that we did not believe that there was a case either for purposes of sanctions or summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58106 - 2010-12-28
that we did not believe that there was a case either for purposes of sanctions or summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58106 - 2010-12-28
[PDF]
Town of Sugar Creek v. City of Elkhorn
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2514 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14439 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2514 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Elmer J. K.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2067 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14280 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2067 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14280 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James I. Montroy
2005 WI APP 230 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2004AP3249
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI APP 230 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2004AP3249
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the Bollants from bringing an action for nuisance.[1] The court rejected this argument. ¶5 The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70216 - 2011-08-24
the Bollants from bringing an action for nuisance.[1] The court rejected this argument. ¶5 The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70216 - 2011-08-24