Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55811 - 55820 of 61694 for judgment.
Search results 55811 - 55820 of 61694 for judgment.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
colloquy with Pineda, the court accepted her no contest pleas and entered a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069167 - 2026-01-27
colloquy with Pineda, the court accepted her no contest pleas and entered a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069167 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
of appeal says that Schindler is appealing a “judgment of conviction.” However, there is no “judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754920 - 2024-01-25
of appeal says that Schindler is appealing a “judgment of conviction.” However, there is no “judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754920 - 2024-01-25
[PDF]
Barron County v. Kathy S.
rights is filed under s. 48.41 or 48.415 or an appeal from a judgment terminating or denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15970 - 2017-09-21
rights is filed under s. 48.41 or 48.415 or an appeal from a judgment terminating or denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment on any of the grounds specified in [WIS. STAT. §] 806.07(1) ….” WIS. STAT. § 48.46(2). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147385 - 2017-09-21
the judgment on any of the grounds specified in [WIS. STAT. §] 806.07(1) ….” WIS. STAT. § 48.46(2). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147385 - 2017-09-21
Thomas Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Board of Zoning Appeals
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12657 - 2005-03-31
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., born March 8, 2005. A judgment of paternity was entered in 2007. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98052 - 2014-09-15
., born March 8, 2005. A judgment of paternity was entered in 2007. The parties stipulated to joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98052 - 2014-09-15
Richard L. Hermann v. Town of Delavan
from taxation and sought a declaratory judgment against the city. The city responded that its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10266 - 2005-03-31
from taxation and sought a declaratory judgment against the city. The city responded that its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10266 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher G. Tillman
safety so as to conform to Tillman’s no contest pleas.[2] The judgment of conviction was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7450 - 2005-05-09
safety so as to conform to Tillman’s no contest pleas.[2] The judgment of conviction was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7450 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. Marius Erby appeals from a judgment of conviction entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152304 - 2017-09-21
) Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. Marius Erby appeals from a judgment of conviction entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John S. Kowalchuk v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
upon existing facts or rights, or which seeks a judgment in a pretended controversy when in reality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15477 - 2017-09-21
upon existing facts or rights, or which seeks a judgment in a pretended controversy when in reality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15477 - 2017-09-21