Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 55841 - 55850 of 83359 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
how that results in what is absolutely the ineluctable conclusion you must derive from this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47473 - 2010-03-01

COURT OF APPEALS
disputes during the time leading up to the shooting. The State’s theory of the case was that Akins shot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114891 - 2014-06-23

[PDF] State v. Arturo Perez
. 2 The jury was so instructed in this case. No. 94-3302-CR -5- Perez testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8388 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Shannan M. Nipple
been at work. Shannan presented no evidence; but instead, elected to present her case entirely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13829 - 2014-09-15

State v. Rheuben McClain
incident was properly admitted to “establish the context of the crime or to fully present the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8232 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 190
2006 WI APP 190 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2575
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26048 - 2014-09-15

99-CV-208 Randal Bidstrup v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
2001 WI App 171 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-1607 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2698 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the separation date of September 22, 2004, MTI cannot pursue a make[-]whole remedy in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72231 - 2011-10-12

[PDF] WI APP 71
2008 WI APP 71 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP761
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32288 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and explain how, under the facts of the particular case, the sentence selected advances those objectives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30980 - 2007-11-27