Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 561 - 570 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 561 - 570 of 24568 for extending.
2009 WI APP 148
years and six months of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision. On April 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40411 - 2009-10-27
years and six months of initial confinement followed by three years of extended supervision. On April 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40411 - 2009-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
extended supervision by the same amount; (2) acted contrary to Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1) (2001-02)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32434 - 2008-04-14
extended supervision by the same amount; (2) acted contrary to Wis. Stat. § 968.20(1) (2001-02)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32434 - 2008-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his extended supervision are No. 2015AP2074-CR 2 unconstitutional; (4) the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171628 - 2017-09-21
of his extended supervision are No. 2015AP2074-CR 2 unconstitutional; (4) the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171628 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tony G. Longmire
Longmire also complains that the trial court sentenced him to an excessive period of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
Longmire also complains that the trial court sentenced him to an excessive period of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tony G. Longmire
sentenced him to an excessive period of extended supervision and failed to consider relevant “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6129 - 2017-09-19
sentenced him to an excessive period of extended supervision and failed to consider relevant “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6129 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to the conditions of Trenshaw’s extended supervision. In response to this court’s order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762151 - 2024-02-15
to a challenge to the conditions of Trenshaw’s extended supervision. In response to this court’s order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762151 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to the conditions of Trenshaw’s extended supervision. In response to this court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762151 - 2024-02-15
to a challenge to the conditions of Trenshaw’s extended supervision. In response to this court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762151 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this no-merit appeal and to extend the time for filing a postconviction motion. Mastaler, by counsel, now
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687084 - 2023-08-08
this no-merit appeal and to extend the time for filing a postconviction motion. Mastaler, by counsel, now
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687084 - 2023-08-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this no-merit appeal and to extend the time for filing a postconviction motion. No. 2020AP1980-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647481 - 2023-04-26
this no-merit appeal and to extend the time for filing a postconviction motion. No. 2020AP1980-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647481 - 2023-04-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
confinement and eleven years’ extended supervision on count one; two years’ initial confinement and two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98828 - 2014-09-15
confinement and eleven years’ extended supervision on count one; two years’ initial confinement and two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98828 - 2014-09-15