Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5611 - 5620 of 44277 for WA 0812 2782 5310 [[PANDAWA]] Biaya Borongan Kitchen Set Wastafel Premium Serengan Surakarta.

COURT OF APPEALS
restitution made by payment or community service shall be set off against any judgment in favor of the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100806 - 2013-08-12

[MS WORD] FA-4171VA: Declaration to Show Cause and to Change: Custody/Placement/Support/Maintenance
. |_| 2. a new set amount of $ per . |_| 3. held open (no payment
/formdisplay/FA-4171VA.doc?formNumber=FA-4171VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-06

[PDF] State v. William J. Volovsek
before the trial court to set aside the plea and judgment before filing this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12737 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John Nierengarten v. State
. 1990). The scope of our review is prescribed by § 227.57(5), STATS.: "The court shall set aside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9950 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
that the legislature set up. The legislature dictates largely the “tone” of the law and the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33222 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Michael S. Elkins v. Shawn B. Schneider
that a judge had been assigned and a date set for trial. Without this documentation, we are unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3791 - 2017-09-20

State v. Terry L. Cleveland
the benefit of a presentence investigation report (PSI) which set forth Cleveland’s April 1989 conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11121 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
conclusion that these potential issues lack arguable merit. The no-merit report sets forth an adequate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97348 - 2013-05-28

State v. Kay H. Dawson
is unenforceable because it fails to comply with the minimum height requirements set forth in the Uniform Traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3378 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bruce J. Meagher
., consistent with the reinstatement procedure set forth in SCR 22.30.[3] Following a hearing on April 19, 2004
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16785 - 2005-03-31