Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5741 - 5750 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 5741 - 5750 of 69366 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel, Attorney Michael Backes, informed the court that he was not prepared to proceed. Backes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73344 - 2011-11-07
counsel, Attorney Michael Backes, informed the court that he was not prepared to proceed. Backes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73344 - 2011-11-07
[PDF]
State v. John C. Johnson
for a second-offense operating while intoxicated. First, he argues that probable cause is required to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2276 - 2017-09-19
for a second-offense operating while intoxicated. First, he argues that probable cause is required to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2276 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
officer, Corey Colburn, tried to contact Long in his apartment, but he did not respond. Colburn had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131902 - 2014-12-22
officer, Corey Colburn, tried to contact Long in his apartment, but he did not respond. Colburn had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131902 - 2014-12-22
State v. Lonny Mayer
to a witness in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 939.30(1), 939.31 and 940.201(2) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6870 - 2005-03-31
to a witness in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 939.30(1), 939.31 and 940.201(2) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6870 - 2005-03-31
State v. Max W. Ohlmann
of the evidence against him. He argues that the affidavit supporting the warrant contained recklessly made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26366 - 2006-09-05
of the evidence against him. He argues that the affidavit supporting the warrant contained recklessly made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26366 - 2006-09-05
State v. Stanley A. Otis
to Wisconsin’s Implied Consent law.[2] When he asked Otis whether he would submit to a chemical breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31
to Wisconsin’s Implied Consent law.[2] When he asked Otis whether he would submit to a chemical breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lonny Mayer
) (2001-02).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Mayer claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6870 - 2017-09-20
) (2001-02).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Mayer claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6870 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ronan T. Heaney
that the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. He argues that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6167 - 2017-09-19
that the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. He argues that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6167 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, to which he pled guilty. He also appeals from an order of the trial court denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250587 - 2019-11-26
, to which he pled guilty. He also appeals from an order of the trial court denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250587 - 2019-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2020AP985 3 ¶4 Hendriksen explained that he was trained to detect speeding violations both by eye
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296051 - 2020-10-14
). No. 2020AP985 3 ¶4 Hendriksen explained that he was trained to detect speeding violations both by eye
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296051 - 2020-10-14