Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57421 - 57430 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 57421 - 57430 of 83455 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
that are testimonial. Kolosso argues that the third definition applies to his case: “Statements that were made under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28734 - 2007-04-16
that are testimonial. Kolosso argues that the third definition applies to his case: “Statements that were made under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28734 - 2007-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=874626 - 2024-11-14
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=874626 - 2024-11-14
[PDF]
State v. Keith S. Betts
direct appeal and rejected, or in the case of Betts's argument that his sentence was outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8005 - 2017-09-19
direct appeal and rejected, or in the case of Betts's argument that his sentence was outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8005 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
complaint. In exchange, the State agreed to move to dismiss outright the remaining charges in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
complaint. In exchange, the State agreed to move to dismiss outright the remaining charges in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on electronic monitoring in Illinois while on parole in a Wisconsin case. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212304 - 2018-05-09
on electronic monitoring in Illinois while on parole in a Wisconsin case. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212304 - 2018-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
the prosecution and for failing to investigate his case. After hearing testimony and argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5764 - 2017-09-19
the prosecution and for failing to investigate his case. After hearing testimony and argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5764 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but nevertheless determined a six-person jury would hear the case. After an evidentiary hearing, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120185 - 2014-09-15
but nevertheless determined a six-person jury would hear the case. After an evidentiary hearing, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120185 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP1676 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241154 - 2019-05-22
. No. 2018AP1676 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241154 - 2019-05-22
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. Wincek
, that is not necessarily the case. The trial court’s comments at sentencing plainly indicate that the court believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10692 - 2017-09-20
, that is not necessarily the case. The trial court’s comments at sentencing plainly indicate that the court believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10692 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218786 - 2018-09-12
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218786 - 2018-09-12