Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57421 - 57430 of 83479 for simple case search.
Search results 57421 - 57430 of 83479 for simple case search.
State v. Walter E. Cline
counts. The prosecutor refused Cline's counteroffer and the case went to trial. The jury convicted him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9848 - 2005-03-31
counts. The prosecutor refused Cline's counteroffer and the case went to trial. The jury convicted him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9848 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The Kaukauna Municipal Court denied Loescher’s requests to reopen the 1997 case and vacate the judgment as void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125616 - 2014-11-03
. The Kaukauna Municipal Court denied Loescher’s requests to reopen the 1997 case and vacate the judgment as void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125616 - 2014-11-03
Thomas J. Dwyer v. Charles B. Bays
decision in this case, we held in Estate of Thompson the paternity statute of limitations does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6421 - 2005-03-31
decision in this case, we held in Estate of Thompson the paternity statute of limitations does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6421 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Updated: December 2, 2008
of rules for recusal when a party or lawyer in a case made contribution effecting a judicial campaign 06
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34773 - 2014-09-15
of rules for recusal when a party or lawyer in a case made contribution effecting a judicial campaign 06
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34773 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but nevertheless determined a six-person jury would hear the case. After an evidentiary hearing, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120185 - 2014-09-15
but nevertheless determined a six-person jury would hear the case. After an evidentiary hearing, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120185 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Paula Steinmetz v. Thomas Steinmetz
to this divorce case. Nevertheless, we may sustain the circuit court’s decision for other reasons. See Bence v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13008 - 2017-09-21
to this divorce case. Nevertheless, we may sustain the circuit court’s decision for other reasons. See Bence v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13008 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 124
2006 WI 124 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP1238-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27090 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI 124 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP1238-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27090 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP699-CRNM 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108198 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP699-CRNM 2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108198 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. Wincek
, that is not necessarily the case. The trial court’s comments at sentencing plainly indicate that the court believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10692 - 2017-09-20
, that is not necessarily the case. The trial court’s comments at sentencing plainly indicate that the court believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10692 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be meritorious. The no-merit report does not discuss the mandatory DNA surcharges applied in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163499 - 2017-09-21
be meritorious. The no-merit report does not discuss the mandatory DNA surcharges applied in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163499 - 2017-09-21