Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57461 - 57470 of 68271 for law.

Ronald Waites v. Gary R. McCaughtry
the adjustment committee kept within its jurisdiction, whether it acted according to law, whether the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9153 - 2005-03-31

State v. Terrence L. Webb
Commission on Law Enforcement recognized that a prosecutor's threat to punish a defendant who does not plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10964 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Frank M. Kett
& 97-1102 6 The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law which we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12138 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Charlie Tate, Jr. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin
). If the trial court considers the pertinent facts, applies the correct law, and reaches a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16331 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 26
. § 88.87(2)(c). Interpretation and application of a statute are matters of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257385 - 2020-06-15

Richard G. Paar v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
is not relevant in this case. Based on case law, such as D'Angelo v. Cornell Paperboard Prods. Co., 59 Wis.2d 46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9634 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 29
on the briefs of Hans P. Koesser of Koesser Law Office, S.C., of Kenosha. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45999 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous” and then determine as a matter of law whether fees and costs should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47886 - 2010-03-15

State v. Dennis R. Thiel
this court requires us to examine Wis. Stat. ch. 980. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17478 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jannice C. Petry
constitutions is a question of law that this court decides without deference to the trial court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3234 - 2005-03-31