Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57731 - 57740 of 67974 for law.

[PDF] 2025AP002121 - 2025-12-03 Court Order
to the statutory phrase “consistent with State and local law” in 8 U.S.C. § 1357(g)(1); and 3. What impact
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/25ap2121_1203order.pdf - 2025-12-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on Agnew’s character. The resulting sentence was within the potential maximum authorized by law, see State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30

[PDF] Raymond R. Chavera v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
and applied Dr. Yost's opinion. There is no question of law involved in this case. The question is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8172 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rodney R. Clark
an individual has been placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense is a question of law that this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2467 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the potential twenty-nine-year and three-month maximum range authorized by law, see State v. Scaccio, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747657 - 2024-01-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
confinement. It arises in common law and is guaranteed by the state and federal constitutions, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749271 - 2024-01-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
forth by the defendant constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review independently. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854290 - 2024-09-26

COURT OF APPEALS
, Rushing has already been convicted of the crime. Thus, he lacks credibility as a matter of law. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96325 - 2013-05-06

Douglas County Department of Human Services v. Susan L.
a question of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 141 Wis.2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311, 313 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12881 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Casey M. Fisher
of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10683 - 2017-09-20