Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5781 - 5790 of 69971 for as he.

State v. Chad E. Lamberies
intoxicated. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Keandre Frazier appeals a judgment of conviction. He challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95338 - 2014-09-15

State v. Lonny Mayer
to a witness in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 939.30(1), 939.31 and 940.201(2) (2001-02).[1] He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6870 - 2005-03-31

State v. James D. Lammers
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises claims related to what he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24598 - 2006-03-28

[PDF] State v. John C. Johnson
for a second-offense operating while intoxicated. First, he argues that probable cause is required to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2276 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of possessing illegal drugs, and one count of possessing an electric weapon. He also appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27161 - 2006-11-15

State v. Stanley A. Otis
to Wisconsin’s Implied Consent law.[2] When he asked Otis whether he would submit to a chemical breath test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of an intoxicant, third offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30342 - 2007-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Corey Colburn, tried to contact Long in his apartment, but he did not respond. Colburn had dispatch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131902 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ronan T. Heaney
that the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. He argues that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6167 - 2017-09-19