Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57811 - 57820 of 67974 for law.

[PDF] County of Sauk v. Jammie M. Douglas
standard of law, the circuit court found that the destruction of the blood sample was due to “innocent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6274 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300240 - 2020-10-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an outdated instruction, the circuit court nonetheless relied on the appropriate law when rendering its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=547553 - 2022-07-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
or analogous case law that would dictate a different result. Accordingly, we conclude that the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101156 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Levi Booth
entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20701 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶30. Here, the postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=748852 - 2024-01-09

CA Blank Order
claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21

COURT OF APPEALS
)[1] requires us to engage in statutory interpretation, which presents a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140354 - 2015-04-22

[PDF] State v. Gerald D. O'Brien
3 This case presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review as a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15317 - 2017-09-21

State v. Franklin A. Barton
was prejudiced by counsel's deficient performance is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7740 - 2005-03-31