Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5801 - 5810 of 74557 for public records.
Search results 5801 - 5810 of 74557 for public records.
CA Blank Order
, Kniess’s character and prior record, and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140855 - 2015-04-27
, Kniess’s character and prior record, and the need to protect the public. See State v. Harris, 119 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140855 - 2015-04-27
CA Blank Order
Courthouse P.O. Box 400 Rhinelander, WI 54501 Colleen Marion Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138012 - 2015-03-23
Courthouse P.O. Box 400 Rhinelander, WI 54501 Colleen Marion Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138012 - 2015-03-23
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7575 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7575 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7579 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7579 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7577 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7577 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138270 - 2017-09-21
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138270 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
instead proceeded directly to publication. The court also stated, “And instead of publishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86754 - 2012-09-04
instead proceeded directly to publication. The court also stated, “And instead of publishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86754 - 2012-09-04
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7576 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7576 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report, the response, and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141397 - 2015-05-12
a response. Upon consideration of the report, the response, and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141397 - 2015-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141397 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141397 - 2017-09-21