Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58211 - 58220 of 83919 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 58211 - 58220 of 83919 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, materially misrepresented the strength of the State’s case causing him to enter a guilty plea. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244215 - 2019-07-30
, materially misrepresented the strength of the State’s case causing him to enter a guilty plea. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244215 - 2019-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discussed the case and Garcia’s rights in relation to his appeal, most recently in a March 6 telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295054 - 2020-10-14
discussed the case and Garcia’s rights in relation to his appeal, most recently in a March 6 telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295054 - 2020-10-14
Carl Rucker v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
7, 2000, moved to vacate the judgment and reopen the case. While Rucker opposed the motion, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2861 - 2005-03-31
7, 2000, moved to vacate the judgment and reopen the case. While Rucker opposed the motion, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2861 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
) years [sic], at the conclusion of which the case shall be dismissed provided you abide by the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3118 - 2010-02-21
) years [sic], at the conclusion of which the case shall be dismissed provided you abide by the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3118 - 2010-02-21
State v. Francisco Hernandez-Rosas
or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive. This case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6251 - 2011-01-09
or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive. This case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6251 - 2011-01-09
State v. Daniel C. Clussman
the obstructing for the most part was going to be a probation case.” He did not think an instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
the obstructing for the most part was going to be a probation case.” He did not think an instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13554 - 2005-03-31
Goodman Forest Industries, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
and [Respondents] were not brought into the case until January of 1995. So the action against them is barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11070 - 2005-03-31
and [Respondents] were not brought into the case until January of 1995. So the action against them is barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11070 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This court must consider the nature of the State’s case, the defense presented at trial and the connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32755 - 2009-09-17
. This court must consider the nature of the State’s case, the defense presented at trial and the connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32755 - 2009-09-17
State v. Freeman Canady
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1457-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15597 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1457-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15597 - 2005-03-31
Sherri Lange v. William P.E. Nelson
that psychological evaluations must be performed in every case. ¶8 Here, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2327 - 2005-03-31
that psychological evaluations must be performed in every case. ¶8 Here, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2327 - 2005-03-31