Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58261 - 58270 of 76954 for judgment for u s.
Search results 58261 - 58270 of 76954 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of mental disease or defect (NGI) plea, “used [his] mental health issue[s] at trial to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418090 - 2021-08-31
of mental disease or defect (NGI) plea, “used [his] mental health issue[s] at trial to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=418090 - 2021-08-31
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
to Justice Commission ("Commission"). This order established an evaluation "(s)ix months before the State
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175265 - 2017-09-21
to Justice Commission ("Commission"). This order established an evaluation "(s)ix months before the State
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175265 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dodge County v. Ryan E. M.
is detained under s. 51.15 or this section the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3914 - 2017-09-20
is detained under s. 51.15 or this section the court shall hold a hearing to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3914 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Juneau County: PAUL S. CURRAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham and Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91016 - 2014-09-15
for Juneau County: PAUL S. CURRAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham and Sherman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91016 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Leonard L. Jones v. Division Administrator
, or in a tribal jail under s. 302.445, pending disposition of probation or parole revocation proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8420 - 2017-09-19
, or in a tribal jail under s. 302.445, pending disposition of probation or parole revocation proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8420 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the agency’s decision under s. 227.47 or the person’s attorney of record. Application of § 227.53(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34841 - 2014-09-15
in the agency’s decision under s. 227.47 or the person’s attorney of record. Application of § 227.53(1)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34841 - 2014-09-15
State v. Owen Andrew Kreinus
) the factor(s) was/were not in existence or was/were unknowingly overlooked at sentencing, and (2) the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17754 - 2005-04-18
) the factor(s) was/were not in existence or was/were unknowingly overlooked at sentencing, and (2) the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17754 - 2005-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 30, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of App...
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: raymond s. huber, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86601 - 2012-08-29
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: raymond s. huber, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86601 - 2012-08-29
State v. Paul Barney Wozniak
and circumstances of the behavior that was the basis of the allegation in the petition under s. 980.02 (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24642 - 2006-03-27
and circumstances of the behavior that was the basis of the allegation in the petition under s. 980.02 (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24642 - 2006-03-27
[PDF]
WI APP 32
, 247, 448 N.W.2d 13 (Ct. App. 1989). We interpret statutes using the following method: [S]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45727 - 2014-09-15
, 247, 448 N.W.2d 13 (Ct. App. 1989). We interpret statutes using the following method: [S]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45727 - 2014-09-15