Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58481 - 58490 of 83395 for simple case search.

[PDF] State v. Jaamal D. Bell
was deprived of hearing must be “important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4927 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128240 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
continued: The parties are willing to compromise in order to resolve this case and both parties request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140563 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
), which governs small claims trials and provides that once a party demands a jury in a small claims case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249767 - 2019-12-09

[PDF] Village of Hatley v. Steven Anderson
, the judgment is affirmed. The facts giving rise to this case are undisputed. Anderson purchased property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10909 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Jackie L. Putskey
to this court’s order dated July 10, 1998, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14156 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, in a related medical malpractice case (the Vincent lawsuit). Based on our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772289 - 2024-03-05

[PDF] State v. Joseph S. Barfoot
of ineffectiveness based on hindsight. Rather, the case is reviewed from counsel’s perspective at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15713 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey S. Amerson
. It is the theory of defense in this case that Jeffrey S. Amerson had not consumed an amount of alcohol sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12081 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kionta L. Crockett
] to this case. Is it worthy of something more o[r] some further consideration? [The trial court has] decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20603 - 2005-12-12