Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5851 - 5860 of 12458 for mr.
Search results 5851 - 5860 of 12458 for mr.
[PDF]
NOTICE
with his attorney. The court discredited Pickerign’s postconviction testimony by noting: “It suits Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26856 - 2014-09-15
with his attorney. The court discredited Pickerign’s postconviction testimony by noting: “It suits Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26856 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was unknown, as shown by the following exchange at the hearing on custody: MR. YOUNG: Just so I understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312375 - 2020-12-10
was unknown, as shown by the following exchange at the hearing on custody: MR. YOUNG: Just so I understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312375 - 2020-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; and that “[a]lthough it was unfortunately not made part of the record, a document certainly exists that Mr. Powell
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108709 - 2017-09-21
; and that “[a]lthough it was unfortunately not made part of the record, a document certainly exists that Mr. Powell
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108709 - 2017-09-21
State v. Johnny L. Thomas
inkling that Mr. Thomas is in custody already.” On appeal, Thomas argues that being viewed in shackles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13192 - 2005-03-31
inkling that Mr. Thomas is in custody already.” On appeal, Thomas argues that being viewed in shackles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13192 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
plea and assume a full defense of this action.” Trial counsel added: I talked with [Mr. Olmstead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109035 - 2014-03-18
plea and assume a full defense of this action.” Trial counsel added: I talked with [Mr. Olmstead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109035 - 2014-03-18
State v. Hans Gerger
up the preliminary hearing? MR. GERGER: No. ¶4 At the subsequent plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13995 - 2005-03-31
up the preliminary hearing? MR. GERGER: No. ¶4 At the subsequent plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
asks [R.W.] about what he’s got, his convictions, magically not Mr. Ward. [PROSECUTOR]: Objection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=565645 - 2022-09-13
asks [R.W.] about what he’s got, his convictions, magically not Mr. Ward. [PROSECUTOR]: Objection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=565645 - 2022-09-13
CA Blank Order
with the State: Mr. Nieves is aware of the fact that he’s giving that issue up in some consideration for both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123014 - 2014-10-07
with the State: Mr. Nieves is aware of the fact that he’s giving that issue up in some consideration for both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123014 - 2014-10-07
State v. Jewel C.
.’s] only testimony is going to be that she told Mr. [C.] she [sic] was not the father, that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
.’s] only testimony is going to be that she told Mr. [C.] she [sic] was not the father, that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The PSI author noted: “Mr. Gleason has a long history of similar behavior all because he wants more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100721 - 2017-09-21
. The PSI author noted: “Mr. Gleason has a long history of similar behavior all because he wants more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100721 - 2017-09-21