Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58571 - 58580 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 58571 - 58580 of 83431 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
of firewood from a cabin in Ashland County.” Dezotell was a witness in a pending criminal case against Hoeft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72951 - 2011-10-31
of firewood from a cabin in Ashland County.” Dezotell was a witness in a pending criminal case against Hoeft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72951 - 2011-10-31
[PDF]
Ramiro Estrada v. State
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3055 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14691 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3055 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14691 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph S. Barfoot
on hindsight. Rather, the case is reviewed from counsel’s perspective at the time of trial, and the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15713 - 2005-03-31
on hindsight. Rather, the case is reviewed from counsel’s perspective at the time of trial, and the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15713 - 2005-03-31
Paras Reddy v. Town of Belmont
or fact, we examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13512 - 2005-03-31
or fact, we examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13512 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court’s denial of his May 1, 2013, motion. Westmoreland cited additional case law to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113298 - 2014-06-02
of the trial court’s denial of his May 1, 2013, motion. Westmoreland cited additional case law to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113298 - 2014-06-02
State v. Stacey R.W.
earlier. Stacey claimed that he “wishes to litigate matters in this case.” He wrote that from past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
earlier. Stacey claimed that he “wishes to litigate matters in this case.” He wrote that from past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3131 - 2005-03-31
Sandra Persinger v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
, 175 (1976), and the circumstances of the case, Gerrard Realty, 89 Wis.2d at 143, 277 N.W.2d at 870
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8916 - 2005-03-31
, 175 (1976), and the circumstances of the case, Gerrard Realty, 89 Wis.2d at 143, 277 N.W.2d at 870
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8916 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Casanova Retail Liquor Store, Inc. v. State
Case No.: 95-1389-FT †PETITION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9079 - 2017-09-19
Case No.: 95-1389-FT †PETITION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9079 - 2017-09-19
State v. Teng Vang
. State, 92 Wis. 2d 372, 383, 284 N.W.2d 917 (1979) (“We know of no case law holding that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21456 - 2006-02-21
. State, 92 Wis. 2d 372, 383, 284 N.W.2d 917 (1979) (“We know of no case law holding that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21456 - 2006-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
as a controlled substance under Schedule II. Wis. Stat. § 961.16(5). Thus, to prove its case, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65432 - 2011-06-08
as a controlled substance under Schedule II. Wis. Stat. § 961.16(5). Thus, to prove its case, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65432 - 2011-06-08