Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58721 - 58730 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] State v. Christopher L. Graef
no indication that the initial detention in this case (encompassing the field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6418 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
collusion “that … substantially increased the attorney fees incurred in this case and constitute[d] over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102087 - 2013-09-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of this case in a previous appeal, Alliant Credit Union v. City of Columbus, No. 2022AP258, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978605 - 2025-07-03

COURT OF APPEALS
). The court shall examine all jurors to discover whether the juror has any opinions on the case or any bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30691 - 2007-10-23

COURT OF APPEALS
] Although the victim in this case was under the age of 13, the “elements only” test focuses on the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41391 - 2009-09-29

Fred J. Perri v. Diocese of La Crosse
). Perri argues that, unlike in Black, there is a dispute in this case as to whether the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8582 - 2005-03-31

Eli Frank v.
for it. In light of those mitigating factors discussed below and the factual posture of the case presented, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17092 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339622 - 2021-02-24

Ronald E. Wilke v. City of Appleton
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8508 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ricky McMorris
, the case investigator and another officer viewed the surveillance tape. Based on these viewings, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9434 - 2005-03-31