Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 58801 - 58810 of 63218 for records.
Search results 58801 - 58810 of 63218 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
homes on Pickerel Slough Road—we see no reasonable basis in this record for inferring that Hoard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31015 - 2007-11-28
homes on Pickerel Slough Road—we see no reasonable basis in this record for inferring that Hoard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31015 - 2007-11-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
record, preventing her from obtaining financing. Consequently, even if Hestekin is acquitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130173 - 2017-09-21
record, preventing her from obtaining financing. Consequently, even if Hestekin is acquitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130173 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). No. 2015AP70 2 sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171141 - 2017-09-21
). No. 2015AP70 2 sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171141 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suppression motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
suppression motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suppression motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
suppression motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
.... It is clear from the case law, from the record in the instant case, and from a commonsense perspective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51804 - 2010-07-07
.... It is clear from the case law, from the record in the instant case, and from a commonsense perspective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51804 - 2010-07-07
State v. Scott D. Steffes
and quoted sources omitted). We hold that, under these standards and on this record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14681 - 2005-03-31
and quoted sources omitted). We hold that, under these standards and on this record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14681 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Judith A. Pinchar
. A petition for writ of certiorari was filed on October 8, 1998. A writ issued; the record was submitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16390 - 2017-09-21
. A petition for writ of certiorari was filed on October 8, 1998. A writ issued; the record was submitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16390 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
testimony, and the Commission’s review of the record did not indicate any reason to overturn the ALJ’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61578 - 2014-09-15
testimony, and the Commission’s review of the record did not indicate any reason to overturn the ALJ’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61578 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lisa K. Kraus
of the intoxilyzer test. However, it appears from the record that the defense may not have presented all of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15478 - 2005-03-31
of the intoxilyzer test. However, it appears from the record that the defense may not have presented all of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15478 - 2005-03-31