Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 591 - 600 of 82271 for case code.

COURT OF APPEALS
-day notice under Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.76(3) (Dec. 2006); (2) the Department of Corrections (DOC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88640 - 2012-10-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Katia violated WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 134.06 by failing to return their security deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108400 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“the nature and severity of the case” and Jardine’s “unmet treatment needs,” the Commission concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704891 - 2023-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, arguing Katia violated Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 134.06 by failing to return their security deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108400 - 2007-12-03

the Code of Judicial Ethics?
without violating the Code of Judicial Ethics
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=885 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas B. Brulport
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9228 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that, under the applicable California code and case law interpreting that code, a 1203.4 order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212560 - 2018-05-10

State v. Larry W. W.
presented is whether the definition of gross income in Wis. Admin. Code § HSS 80.02(12) (August 1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8734 - 2005-03-31

Lydia Santiago v. Kathleen Ware
cases," and is therefore discretionary. He argues, however, that Ware had a ministerial duty to look
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8494 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lydia Santiago v. Kathleen Ware
or minor involves choice "in some cases," and is therefore discretionary. He argues, however, that Ware
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8494 - 2017-09-19