Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59161 - 59170 of 65680 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 59161 - 59170 of 65680 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Elliott D. Ray
) the court erred in denying his mistrial motion based on the State’s reference to his felony record; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5074 - 2005-03-31
) the court erred in denying his mistrial motion based on the State’s reference to his felony record; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5074 - 2005-03-31
Debra Christie v. John Husz
in the record indicates that Husz filed a return to the writ. The trial court then set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12239 - 2005-03-31
in the record indicates that Husz filed a return to the writ. The trial court then set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12239 - 2005-03-31
Viola G. Bodach v. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake
. On this record, the trial court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. See § 805.17(2), Stats. Finally, Fontana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11480 - 2005-03-31
. On this record, the trial court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. See § 805.17(2), Stats. Finally, Fontana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11480 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dwayne Williams
transgression of the limitation. We conclude, therefore, that, given the evidence of record and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11507 - 2017-09-19
transgression of the limitation. We conclude, therefore, that, given the evidence of record and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11507 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. The record belies this assertion. Schaffer does not dispute Aubry’s death caused him distress. However, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32731 - 2008-05-19
. The record belies this assertion. Schaffer does not dispute Aubry’s death caused him distress. However, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32731 - 2008-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that decision was not based on substantial evidence in the record. This proposition fails because it ignores
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79223 - 2012-03-07
that decision was not based on substantial evidence in the record. This proposition fails because it ignores
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79223 - 2012-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the record establishes that all four prongs are satisfied here. In addition, we note that contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27286 - 2006-12-04
the record establishes that all four prongs are satisfied here. In addition, we note that contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27286 - 2006-12-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unsuccessfully attempted to admit the endorsement under the business records exception to the hearsay rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118460 - 2014-09-15
unsuccessfully attempted to admit the endorsement under the business records exception to the hearsay rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118460 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
agree with the trial court. There was no need for a Machner hearing since the record clearly showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35872 - 2009-03-11
agree with the trial court. There was no need for a Machner hearing since the record clearly showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35872 - 2009-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
presented for review, with appropriate references to the record.” Moreover, Laskowski never precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92969 - 2013-02-18
presented for review, with appropriate references to the record.” Moreover, Laskowski never precisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92969 - 2013-02-18