Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5971 - 5980 of 74557 for public records.

[MS WORD] JC-1693: Petition in Juvenile Court for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Petition and Motion for Injunction Hearing (Harassment)
the petitioner. Contact includes: contact at petitioner’s home, work, school, public places, in person, by phone
/formdisplay/JC-1693.doc?formNumber=JC-1693&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-31

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 13-16 - Letter to petitioner
conference on June 25, 2014, and voted to schedule a public hearing. That hearing has been scheduled
/supreme/docs/1316petitionerletter.pdf - 2014-08-25

[PDF] Frontsheet
: For the respondent-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs filed by Megan Sanders-Drazen, assistant state public
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365494 - 2021-05-07

COURT OF APPEALS
, and the need to protect the public. The weight to be given to each factor is within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60429 - 2011-03-01

COURT OF APPEALS
that the municipal piers serve a public purpose and are a revenue source for the City. Private piers and slips
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2012-07-24

CA Blank Order
Avenue Marinette, WI 54143 Susan E. Alesia Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119178 - 2014-08-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the motion as lacking a sufficient legal basis. Court records are open to public inspection, with limited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752008 - 2024-01-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the motion as lacking a sufficient legal basis. Court records are open to public inspection, with limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752008 - 2024-01-19

COURT OF APPEALS
the record to determine whether it supports the court’s decision. Randall v. Randall, 2000 WI App 98, ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62849 - 2011-04-13

Louis J. Bricco v. Cavagna Group North America
Bricco were at least fifty-one percent causally negligent as a matter of law, and for public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12570 - 2005-03-31