Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60291 - 60300 of 63539 for records.

[PDF] Carl Kaminski v. David H. Schwarz
is, after all, a matter of public record. See State v. Bollig, 2000 WI 6, ¶6, 232 Wis. 2d 561, 568, 605
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16223 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. The record therefore supports the conclusion that there was probable cause to arrest Copeland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34500 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to be used for an unlawful purpose. I think that the record is clear. [The State] made an argument, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80626 - 2012-04-09

[PDF] State v. Keith A. Franszczak
obtained a video recording from a neighboring business that depicted an individual attempting to gain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3994 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Kimberly D. Erkkila-Miller v. James E. Stoll, M.D.
, and wrote in Erkkila- Miller’s medical records, that he had resected Erkkila-Miller’s eleventh rib
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13110 - 2017-09-21

State v. Timothy J. Pluemer
, and nothing else in the record indicating that a hearing was held on the motion. The court issued a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19708 - 2005-09-21

[PDF] State v. Samuel V. Perez
Wis. 2d at 534) (emphasis added). We discern no record support for Perez being under arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6074 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. Although Moore’s backing down the hallway may not conjure up an image of “flight,” the record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30846 - 2007-11-13

[PDF] State v. Gustavo Espino
be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12575 - 2017-09-21

Town of Sugar Creek v. City of Elkhorn
and the annexation satisfied the “rule of reason.” Since the record supports the court’s findings that the borders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14439 - 2005-03-31