Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 611 - 620 of 6309 for 208.

State v. Ferdinand Walters
review de novo. See State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208, 210 (Ct. App. 1991). Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10796 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 3, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Ap...
precedential effect, Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 186, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997), and we are not at liberty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27635 - 2007-01-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court case.” Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). We are bound by the supreme
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208814 - 2018-02-21

COURT OF APPEALS
and public safety.” State v. Carter, 208 Wis. 2d 142, 156, 560 N.W.2d 256 (1997). The discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34976 - 2008-12-22

[PDF] State v. Robert F. Knuth
interpretation, we will give it that interpretation. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 365, 560 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5804 - 2017-09-19

Roland West v. Shari Marek
at 208. The easement in Stroesser reserved the grantor’s right to “use of the channel by means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15006 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of discretion. See Zutz v. Zutz, 208 Wis. 2d 338, 342, 559 N.W.2d 919 (Ct. App. 1997). We will affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157227 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Danny W. Filter
, and we review the trial court’s ruling de novo. See State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14551 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Janet E. McCrillis v. Harold O. McCrillis
support. Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis.2d 166, 180, 560 N.W.2d 246, 252 (1997). Harold does not challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14657 - 2017-09-21

Fred Eisele v. Allstate Insurance Company
examples. See State v. Ambrose, 196 Wis.2d 768, 777, 540 N.W.2d 208, 212 (Ct. App. 1995); 73 Am. Jur. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13840 - 2005-03-31