Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 611 - 620 of 6142 for sheriff.
Search results 611 - 620 of 6142 for sheriff.
State v. Mark Sevelin
) Sevelin was in constructive custody of the Polk County sheriff while in the treatment center. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
) Sevelin was in constructive custody of the Polk County sheriff while in the treatment center. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On June 4, 2017, Polk County sheriff’s deputy Troy Olson was dispatched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257655 - 2020-04-14
affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On June 4, 2017, Polk County sheriff’s deputy Troy Olson was dispatched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257655 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Mark Sevelin
in the home and (2) Sevelin was in constructive custody of the Polk County sheriff while in the treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10531 - 2017-09-20
in the home and (2) Sevelin was in constructive custody of the Polk County sheriff while in the treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10531 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County Sheriff’s Deputy Mary Nicolais was on routine patrol when she came across a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68451 - 2014-09-15
County Sheriff’s Deputy Mary Nicolais was on routine patrol when she came across a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68451 - 2014-09-15
WI App 119 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2105 Complete Title o...
, respectively. Waterstone expects to recover $1.89 million from the personal guarantees. The sheriff’s sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101445 - 2013-10-29
, respectively. Waterstone expects to recover $1.89 million from the personal guarantees. The sheriff’s sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101445 - 2013-10-29
State v. Barry A. Kundert
¶2 According to the criminal complaint, a Rock County Sheriff’s deputy found Kundert’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3442 - 2005-03-31
¶2 According to the criminal complaint, a Rock County Sheriff’s deputy found Kundert’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3442 - 2005-03-31
County of Milwaukee v. Fairway Transit, Inc.
the sheriff’s department had the authority to issue the citations; (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14605 - 2005-03-31
the sheriff’s department had the authority to issue the citations; (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14605 - 2005-03-31
County of Milwaukee v. Fairway Transit, Inc.
the sheriff’s department had the authority to issue the citations; (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14604 - 2005-03-31
the sheriff’s department had the authority to issue the citations; (2) whether the trial court erred in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14604 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. Fairway Transit, Inc.
is reversed. ¶2 Superior raises three additional issues: (1) whether the sheriff’s department had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14605 - 2017-09-21
is reversed. ¶2 Superior raises three additional issues: (1) whether the sheriff’s department had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14605 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. Superior of Wisconsin, Inc.
is reversed. ¶2 Superior raises three additional issues: (1) whether the sheriff’s department had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14579 - 2017-09-21
is reversed. ¶2 Superior raises three additional issues: (1) whether the sheriff’s department had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14579 - 2017-09-21