Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61661 - 61670 of 64730 for b's.
Search results 61661 - 61670 of 64730 for b's.
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. Barber
were a Class A misdemeanor, and Class B and C felonies. No. 96-3693-CR 10 defense may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11894 - 2017-09-21
were a Class A misdemeanor, and Class B and C felonies. No. 96-3693-CR 10 defense may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11894 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265289 - 2020-06-23
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265289 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
WI 116
relevant to reinstatement. Supreme court rule 22.29(4)(b) requires a petitioner demonstrate he has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55012 - 2014-09-15
relevant to reinstatement. Supreme court rule 22.29(4)(b) requires a petitioner demonstrate he has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55012 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Pluim
judgments and an order of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: HENRY B. BUSLEE, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
judgments and an order of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: HENRY B. BUSLEE, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ervin Burris
- enhancing drug would not be in the public’s or in Burris’s best interest. B. Whether Burris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2634 - 2017-09-19
- enhancing drug would not be in the public’s or in Burris’s best interest. B. Whether Burris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2634 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sorry for that and I’m sorry to [the b]ank.” Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219631 - 2018-09-20
sorry for that and I’m sorry to [the b]ank.” Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219631 - 2018-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808056 - 2024-06-05
. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808056 - 2024-06-05
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Whipp
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12537 - 2017-09-21
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12537 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to the sentencing court’s discretion for the new case.[6] B. The Reconfinement Sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92604 - 2013-02-04
to a challenge to the sentencing court’s discretion for the new case.[6] B. The Reconfinement Sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92604 - 2013-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29876 - 2007-08-01
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29876 - 2007-08-01